After reading some of the comments that were posted, I will attempt to cover more of the readings in my weekly updates. So without skipping a bit, I want to focus on two topics that really struck me from the readings; summer work, and outcomes.
So, the article by Roger R. Rideout was an eyeopener for me. I never really gave much thought to how much work a band/orchestra teacher has to do over their summer break. That is to say, I have never actually experienced a teacher doing any work during their much deserved summer break. However, because many band/orchestra teacher live music, whereas a math teacher may not live math, the summer tasks are fundamental to the running of the band/orchestra program.
I will definitely keep "Summer Tasks for the First-Year Band Director" handy because of its value as a reminder and motivator. While I have considered the majority of suggestions that Rideout suggests, I never really thought about how I would implement them.
The other topic of the reading that struck me was outcomes, and how we as educators are supposed to come up with them. This is a topic that I feel has been neglected for a long time in my education. I have had to write lessons with outcomes in them, but never really thought about what the outcomes mean. As a future teacher, I feel that I should take the outcomes much more seriously.
What has me thinking the most is; "Wow, I am in charge of what these students learn, and the method which they learn it." Now, while I could write a long narrative about how much this scares me to death, I would rather express a fear that is probably much more pertinent to my situation this semester.
After observing this week, I noticed how different my methods and outcomes were for the students than the teacher/program at the school were. I was very aware of all of the techniques that I do not wish to emulate and the techniques of mine which would probably not work in the situation. But, I found that I had way more problems with the outcomes and methods than I did my own teaching style.
First off, I would never use a given tempo as much as the educators I observed. This ranges from Dr. Beats to snapping or clapping. I do not think that this is okay. In fact I have been learning how to teach very differently in my method classes; where students need to be able to keep a steady pulse.
Lastly (I know there are only two), the topic which I was most concerned with was one of the outcomes that was expressed. Again, this may be my 5+ method classes talking, but not having the students watch a conductor at the beginning of their musical training is absurd to me.
What is so concerning for me is that, I would want my students to be conducted and learn/get used to having a conductor. To come full circle, I am not sure I am equipped to teach in the manner that these students have been learning and how the music program wishes the students to learn. Although I am looking forward to teaching, I am very frightened that I will break some norm of teaching that may hurt the students in some way. For my lesson plan, I plan on emulating a lot of techniques that I observed, but I will put my own flavor into them, because I would like to see some different outcomes for these students.
Ian-
ReplyDeleteIt's OK to take a couple weeks off each summer, but planning for the program is cyclical. There is always more reflection of the year past and considerations for the year ahead. Professional development opportunities may guide you to new repertoire or a different way of thinking about lesson outcomes.
Remember that you approached the 5+ method classes with a certain level of music competency that your beginners most likely will not possess. Maintaining a steady pulse may be the only thing that holds the group together. Think about reinforcing the pulse with kinesthetic activities prior to playing. This may be enough for your group to then play the exercise with Dr. Beat.
Have fun on Wednesday!
tk